This provision aims in order to avoid duplication of trials and conflicting decisions on the exact same reason for motion. Standing: Part forty five was omitted by Ordinance XXVII of 1981. The omission implies a change during the legal framework, potentially due to variations in Worldwide legislation or bilateral agreements https://alexislnyjk.thezenweb.com/hire-succession-matter-lawyer-near-me-karachi-options-68286915